<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web02.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 22:45:10 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>TechSNAP - Episodes Tagged with “Vulnerabilities”</title>
    <link>https://techsnap.systems/tags/vulnerabilities</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <description>Systems, Network, and Administration Podcast. Every two weeks TechSNAP covers the stories that impact those of us in the tech industry, and all of us that follow it. Every episode we dedicate a portion of the show to answer audience questions, discuss best practices, and solving your problems.
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>Systems, Network, and Administration Podcast. </itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Jupiter Broadcasting</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Systems, Network, and Administration Podcast. Every two weeks TechSNAP covers the stories that impact those of us in the tech industry, and all of us that follow it. Every episode we dedicate a portion of the show to answer audience questions, discuss best practices, and solving your problems.
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/9/95197d05-40d6-4e68-8e0b-2f586ce8dc55/cover.jpg?v=4"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Jupiter Broadcasting</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>chris@jupiterbroadcasting.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="News">
  <itunes:category text="Tech News"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>410: Epyc Encryption</title>
  <link>https://techsnap.systems/410</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">31d2ecad-fd20-405f-bbbe-e2e6bc566e0c</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <author>Jupiter Broadcasting</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/95197d05-40d6-4e68-8e0b-2f586ce8dc55/31d2ecad-fd20-405f-bbbe-e2e6bc566e0c.mp3" length="36093724" type="audio/mp3"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Jupiter Broadcasting</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>It's CPU release season and we get excited about AMD's new line of server chips. Plus our take on AMD's approach to memory encryption, and our struggle to make sense of Intel's Comet Lake line.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>50:07</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/9/95197d05-40d6-4e68-8e0b-2f586ce8dc55/cover.jpg?v=4"/>
  <description>It's CPU release season and we get excited about AMD's new line of server chips. Plus our take on AMD's approach to memory encryption, and our struggle to make sense of Intel's Comet Lake line.
Also, a few Windows worms you should know about, the end of the road for EV certs, and an embarrassing new Bluetooth attack. 
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>AMD, AMD rome, amd epyc, CPU, intel, comet lake, ice lake, cpu benchmarks, SGX, SEV, SEM, security, encryption, virtualization, memory encryption, intel me, amd psp, windows, text services framework, ctftool security, bluekeep, rdp, vulnerabilities, worms, bluetooth, entropy, bruteforce, KNOB, knob attack, https, ssl, tls, ev certs, extended validation, ssl certifications, certificate lifespace, sysadmin podcast, DevOps, TechSNAP, jupiter broadcasting</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s CPU release season and we get excited about AMD&#39;s new line of server chips. Plus our take on AMD&#39;s approach to memory encryption, and our struggle to make sense of Intel&#39;s Comet Lake line.</p>

<p>Also, a few Windows worms you should know about, the end of the road for EV certs, and an embarrassing new Bluetooth attack.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="A detailed look at AMD’s new Epyc “Rome” 7nm server CPUs | Ars Technica" rel="nofollow" href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2019/08/a-detailed-look-at-amds-new-epyc-rome-7nm-server-cpus/">A detailed look at AMD’s new Epyc “Rome” 7nm server CPUs | Ars Technica</a> &mdash; The short version of the story is, Epyc "Rome" is to the server what Ryzen 3000 was to the desktop—bringing significantly improved IPC, more cores, and better thermal efficiency than either its current-generation Intel equivalents or its first-generation Epyc predecessors.</li><li><a title="AMD Rome Second Generation EPYC Review: 2x 64-core Benchmarked" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/14694/amd-rome-epyc-2nd-gen">AMD Rome Second Generation EPYC Review: 2x 64-core Benchmarked</a> &mdash; Ever since the Opteron days, AMD's market share has been rounded to zero percent, and with its first generation of EPYC processors using its new Zen microarchitecture, that number skipped up a small handful of points, but everyone has been waiting with bated breath for the second swing at the ball. AMD's Rome platform solves the concerns that first gen Naples had, plus this CPU family is designed to do many things: a new CPU microarchitecture on 7nm, offer up to 64 cores, offer 128 lanes of PCIe 4.0, offer 8 memory channels, and offer a unified memory architecture based on chiplets. </li><li><a title="AMD EPYC Rome Still Conquering Cascadelake Even Without Mitigations - Phoronix" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&amp;item=epyc-rome-mitigations&amp;num=1">AMD EPYC Rome Still Conquering Cascadelake Even Without Mitigations - Phoronix</a> &mdash; Out of curiosity, I've run some unmitigated benchmarks for the various relevant CPU speculative execution vulnerabilities on both the Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 Cascadelake and AMD EPYC 7742 Rome processors for seeing how the performance differs.</li><li><a title="Intel’s line of notebook CPUs gets more confusing with 14nm Comet Lake | Ars Technica" rel="nofollow" href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2019/08/intels-line-of-notebook-cpus-gets-more-confusing-with-14nm-comet-lake/">Intel’s line of notebook CPUs gets more confusing with 14nm Comet Lake | Ars Technica</a> &mdash; Going by Intel's numbers, Comet Lake looks like a competent upgrade to its predecessor Whiskey Lake. The interesting question—and one largely left unanswered by Intel—is why the company has decided to launch a new line of 14nm notebook CPUs less than a month after launching Ice Lake, its first 10nm notebook CPUs.</li><li><a title="A look at the Windows 10 exploit Google Zero disclosed this week | Ars Technica" rel="nofollow" href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/08/a-look-at-the-windows-10-exploit-google-zero-disclosed-this-week/">A look at the Windows 10 exploit Google Zero disclosed this week | Ars Technica</a> &mdash; On Tuesday, Tavis Ormandy of Google's Project Zero released an exploit kit called ctftool, which uses and abuses Microsoft's Text Services Framework in ways that can effectively get anyone root—er, system that is—on any unpatched Windows 10 system they're able to log in to</li><li><a title="Patch new wormable vulnerabilities in Remote Desktop Services (CVE-2019-1181/1182) – Microsoft Security Response Center" rel="nofollow" href="https://msrc-blog.microsoft.com/2019/08/13/patch-new-wormable-vulnerabilities-in-remote-desktop-services-cve-2019-1181-1182/">Patch new wormable vulnerabilities in Remote Desktop Services (CVE-2019-1181/1182) – Microsoft Security Response Center</a> &mdash; Today Microsoft released a set of fixes for Remote Desktop Services that include two critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerabilities, CVE-2019-1181 and CVE-2019-1182. Like the previously-fixed ‘BlueKeep’ vulnerability (CVE-2019-0708), these two vulnerabilities are also ‘wormable’, meaning that any future malware that exploits these could propagate from vulnerable computer to vulnerable computer without user interaction.

</li><li><a title="KNOB Attack" rel="nofollow" href="https://knobattack.com/">KNOB Attack</a> &mdash; TL;DR: The specification of Bluetooth includes an encryption key negotiation protocol that allows to negotiate encryption keys with 1 Byte of entropy without protecting the integrity of the negotiation process. A remote attacker can manipulate the entropy negotiation to let any standard compliant Bluetooth device negotiate encryption keys with 1 byte of entropy and then brute force the low entropy keys in real time.
</li><li><a title="Troy Hunt: Extended Validation Certificates are (Really, Really) Dead" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.troyhunt.com/extended-validation-certificates-are-really-really-dead/">Troy Hunt: Extended Validation Certificates are (Really, Really) Dead</a> &mdash; With both browsers auto-updating for most people, we're about 10 weeks out from no more EV and the vast majority of web users no longer seeing something they didn't even know was there to begin with! Oh sure, you can still drill down into the certificate and see the entity name, but who's really going to do that? You and I, perhaps, but we're not exactly in the meat of the browser demographics.</li><li><a title="Google wants to reduce lifespan for HTTPS certificates to one year | ZDNet" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-wants-to-reduce-lifespan-for-https-certificates-to-one-year/">Google wants to reduce lifespan for HTTPS certificates to one year | ZDNet</a> &mdash; Scott Helme argues that the security benefits of shorter SSL certificate lifespans have nothing to do with phishing or malware sites, but instead with the SSL certificate revocation process. Helme claims that this process is broken and that bad SSL certificates continue to live on for years after being mississued and revoked.</li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s CPU release season and we get excited about AMD&#39;s new line of server chips. Plus our take on AMD&#39;s approach to memory encryption, and our struggle to make sense of Intel&#39;s Comet Lake line.</p>

<p>Also, a few Windows worms you should know about, the end of the road for EV certs, and an embarrassing new Bluetooth attack.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="A detailed look at AMD’s new Epyc “Rome” 7nm server CPUs | Ars Technica" rel="nofollow" href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2019/08/a-detailed-look-at-amds-new-epyc-rome-7nm-server-cpus/">A detailed look at AMD’s new Epyc “Rome” 7nm server CPUs | Ars Technica</a> &mdash; The short version of the story is, Epyc "Rome" is to the server what Ryzen 3000 was to the desktop—bringing significantly improved IPC, more cores, and better thermal efficiency than either its current-generation Intel equivalents or its first-generation Epyc predecessors.</li><li><a title="AMD Rome Second Generation EPYC Review: 2x 64-core Benchmarked" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/14694/amd-rome-epyc-2nd-gen">AMD Rome Second Generation EPYC Review: 2x 64-core Benchmarked</a> &mdash; Ever since the Opteron days, AMD's market share has been rounded to zero percent, and with its first generation of EPYC processors using its new Zen microarchitecture, that number skipped up a small handful of points, but everyone has been waiting with bated breath for the second swing at the ball. AMD's Rome platform solves the concerns that first gen Naples had, plus this CPU family is designed to do many things: a new CPU microarchitecture on 7nm, offer up to 64 cores, offer 128 lanes of PCIe 4.0, offer 8 memory channels, and offer a unified memory architecture based on chiplets. </li><li><a title="AMD EPYC Rome Still Conquering Cascadelake Even Without Mitigations - Phoronix" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&amp;item=epyc-rome-mitigations&amp;num=1">AMD EPYC Rome Still Conquering Cascadelake Even Without Mitigations - Phoronix</a> &mdash; Out of curiosity, I've run some unmitigated benchmarks for the various relevant CPU speculative execution vulnerabilities on both the Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 Cascadelake and AMD EPYC 7742 Rome processors for seeing how the performance differs.</li><li><a title="Intel’s line of notebook CPUs gets more confusing with 14nm Comet Lake | Ars Technica" rel="nofollow" href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2019/08/intels-line-of-notebook-cpus-gets-more-confusing-with-14nm-comet-lake/">Intel’s line of notebook CPUs gets more confusing with 14nm Comet Lake | Ars Technica</a> &mdash; Going by Intel's numbers, Comet Lake looks like a competent upgrade to its predecessor Whiskey Lake. The interesting question—and one largely left unanswered by Intel—is why the company has decided to launch a new line of 14nm notebook CPUs less than a month after launching Ice Lake, its first 10nm notebook CPUs.</li><li><a title="A look at the Windows 10 exploit Google Zero disclosed this week | Ars Technica" rel="nofollow" href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/08/a-look-at-the-windows-10-exploit-google-zero-disclosed-this-week/">A look at the Windows 10 exploit Google Zero disclosed this week | Ars Technica</a> &mdash; On Tuesday, Tavis Ormandy of Google's Project Zero released an exploit kit called ctftool, which uses and abuses Microsoft's Text Services Framework in ways that can effectively get anyone root—er, system that is—on any unpatched Windows 10 system they're able to log in to</li><li><a title="Patch new wormable vulnerabilities in Remote Desktop Services (CVE-2019-1181/1182) – Microsoft Security Response Center" rel="nofollow" href="https://msrc-blog.microsoft.com/2019/08/13/patch-new-wormable-vulnerabilities-in-remote-desktop-services-cve-2019-1181-1182/">Patch new wormable vulnerabilities in Remote Desktop Services (CVE-2019-1181/1182) – Microsoft Security Response Center</a> &mdash; Today Microsoft released a set of fixes for Remote Desktop Services that include two critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerabilities, CVE-2019-1181 and CVE-2019-1182. Like the previously-fixed ‘BlueKeep’ vulnerability (CVE-2019-0708), these two vulnerabilities are also ‘wormable’, meaning that any future malware that exploits these could propagate from vulnerable computer to vulnerable computer without user interaction.

</li><li><a title="KNOB Attack" rel="nofollow" href="https://knobattack.com/">KNOB Attack</a> &mdash; TL;DR: The specification of Bluetooth includes an encryption key negotiation protocol that allows to negotiate encryption keys with 1 Byte of entropy without protecting the integrity of the negotiation process. A remote attacker can manipulate the entropy negotiation to let any standard compliant Bluetooth device negotiate encryption keys with 1 byte of entropy and then brute force the low entropy keys in real time.
</li><li><a title="Troy Hunt: Extended Validation Certificates are (Really, Really) Dead" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.troyhunt.com/extended-validation-certificates-are-really-really-dead/">Troy Hunt: Extended Validation Certificates are (Really, Really) Dead</a> &mdash; With both browsers auto-updating for most people, we're about 10 weeks out from no more EV and the vast majority of web users no longer seeing something they didn't even know was there to begin with! Oh sure, you can still drill down into the certificate and see the entity name, but who's really going to do that? You and I, perhaps, but we're not exactly in the meat of the browser demographics.</li><li><a title="Google wants to reduce lifespan for HTTPS certificates to one year | ZDNet" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-wants-to-reduce-lifespan-for-https-certificates-to-one-year/">Google wants to reduce lifespan for HTTPS certificates to one year | ZDNet</a> &mdash; Scott Helme argues that the security benefits of shorter SSL certificate lifespans have nothing to do with phishing or malware sites, but instead with the SSL certificate revocation process. Helme claims that this process is broken and that bad SSL certificates continue to live on for years after being mississued and revoked.</li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>405: Update Uncertainty</title>
  <link>https://techsnap.systems/405</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">8a576c94-20cc-497c-9de7-8402cd0a1135</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 20:15:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <author>Jupiter Broadcasting</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/95197d05-40d6-4e68-8e0b-2f586ce8dc55/8a576c94-20cc-497c-9de7-8402cd0a1135.mp3" length="22166906" type="audio/mp3"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Jupiter Broadcasting</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>We explore the risky world of exposed RDP, from the brute force GoldBrute botnet to the dangerously worm-able BlueKeep vulnerability.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>30:47</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/9/95197d05-40d6-4e68-8e0b-2f586ce8dc55/cover.jpg?v=4"/>
  <description>We explore the risky world of exposed RDP, from the brute force GoldBrute botnet to the dangerously worm-able BlueKeep vulnerability.
Plus the importance of automatic updates, and Jim's new backup box.  
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>BlueKeep, RDP, GoldBrute, Terminal Services, Remote Desktop, Windows, Windows Update, network security, security, firewalls, worm, internet worm, wannacry, NSA, Microsoft, updates, patching, vulnerabilities, automatic updates, backups, supermicro, rosewill, ssd, hard drive, NAS, storage, brute force, industrial control systems, out of support, windows xp, patching policies, password security, remote desktop protocol, DevOps, TechSNAP</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>We explore the risky world of exposed RDP, from the brute force GoldBrute botnet to the dangerously worm-able BlueKeep vulnerability.</p>

<p>Plus the importance of automatic updates, and Jim&#39;s new backup box. </p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Errata Security: Almost One Million Vulnerable to BlueKeep Vuln (CVE-2019-0708)" rel="nofollow" href="https://blog.erratasec.com/2019/05/almost-one-million-vulnerable-to.html">Errata Security: Almost One Million Vulnerable to BlueKeep Vuln (CVE-2019-0708)</a> &mdash; Microsoft announced a vulnerability in it's "Remote Desktop" product that can lead to robust, wormable exploits. I scanned the Internet to assess the danger. I find nearly 1-million devices on the public Internet that are vulnerable to the bug. </li><li><a title="Even the NSA is urging Windows users to patch BlueKeep (CVE-2019-0708) | ZDNet" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.zdnet.com/article/even-the-nsa-is-urging-windows-users-to-patch-bluekeep-cve-2019-0708/">Even the NSA is urging Windows users to patch BlueKeep (CVE-2019-0708) | ZDNet</a> &mdash; "[The] NSA is concerned that malicious cyber actors will use the vulnerability in ransomware and exploit kits containing other known exploits, increasing capabilities against other unpatched systems.

</li><li><a title="Prevent a worm by updating Remote Desktop Services (CVE-2019-0708) – MSRC" rel="nofollow" href="https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/msrc/2019/05/14/prevent-a-worm-by-updating-remote-desktop-services-cve-2019-0708/">Prevent a worm by updating Remote Desktop Services (CVE-2019-0708) – MSRC</a> &mdash; This vulnerability is pre-authentication and requires no user interaction. In other words, the vulnerability is ‘wormable’, meaning that any future malware that exploits this vulnerability could propagate from vulnerable computer to vulnerable computer in a similar way as the WannaCry malware spread across the globe in 2017</li><li><a title="BlueKeep - everyone agrees, you should patch PCs running legacy versions of Windows" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.grahamcluley.com/bluekeep-everyone-agrees-you-should-patch-pcs-running-legacy-versions-of-windows/">BlueKeep - everyone agrees, you should patch PCs running legacy versions of Windows</a> &mdash; I have this horrible feeling that the only way we’re going to wake the world up to the need to patch their ageing versions of Windows against the BlueKeep vulnerability is to wait until a malicious worm begins to spread around the world.

</li><li><a title="CVE-2019-0708 | Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability" rel="nofollow" href="https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2019-0708">CVE-2019-0708 | Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</a> &mdash; A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services – formerly known as Terminal Services – when an unauthenticated attacker connects to the target system using RDP and sends specially crafted requests. This vulnerability is pre-authentication and requires no user interaction. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on the target system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.

</li><li><a title="Customer guidance for CVE-2019-0708 | Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability" rel="nofollow" href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4500705/customer-guidance-for-cve-2019-0708">Customer guidance for CVE-2019-0708 | Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</a> &mdash; Microsoft is aware that some customers are running versions of Windows that no longer receive mainstream support. That means those customers will not have received any security updates to protect their systems from CVE-2019-0708, which is a critical remote code execution vulnerability.

</li><li><a title="Forget BlueKeep: Beware the GoldBrute | Threatpost" rel="nofollow" href="https://threatpost.com/forget-bluekeep-beware-goldbrute/145482/">Forget BlueKeep: Beware the GoldBrute | Threatpost</a> &mdash; In the past few days, GoldBrute (named after the Java class it uses) has attempted to brute-force Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) connections for 1.5 million Windows systems and counting, according to Morphus Labs chief research officer Renato Marinho. The botnet is actively scanning the internet for machines with RDP exposed, and trying out weak or reused passwords to see if it can gain access to the systems.</li><li><a title="The GoldBrute botnet" rel="nofollow" href="https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2019/06/10/the-goldbrute-botnet-is-trying-to-crack-open-1-5-million-rdp-servers/">The GoldBrute botnet</a> &mdash; The latest round of bad news emerged last week when Morphus Labs’ researcher Renato Marinho announced the discovery of an aggressive brute force campaign against 1.5 million RDP servers by a botnet called ‘GoldBrute’.

</li><li><a title="Ubuntu Automatic Updates" rel="nofollow" href="https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/serverguide/automatic-updates.html.en">Ubuntu Automatic Updates</a> &mdash; The unattended-upgrades package can be used to automatically install updated packages, and can be configured to update all packages or just install security updates. </li><li><a title="AutoUpdates - Fedora Project Wiki" rel="nofollow" href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoUpdates">AutoUpdates - Fedora Project Wiki</a> &mdash; You must decide whether to use automatic DNF or YUM updates on each of your machines. </li><li><a title="It&#39;s time to block Windows Automatic Updating | Computerworld" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3339563/its-time-to-block-windows-automatic-updating.html">It's time to block Windows Automatic Updating | Computerworld</a> &mdash; Those of you who feel it’s important to install Windows and Office patches the moment they come out – I salute you. The Windows world needs more cannon fodder.</li><li><a title="Windows 10&#39;s Ugly Updates Just Got Uglier. Here&#39;s How To Stay Safe by Disabling Automatic Updates" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinmurnane/2019/04/25/windows-10s-ugly-updates-just-got-uglier-heres-how-to-stay-safe-by-disabling-automatic-updates/#591e6ac67ff0">Windows 10's Ugly Updates Just Got Uglier. Here's How To Stay Safe by Disabling Automatic Updates</a> &mdash; Stay safe by disabling automatic updates? How is that possible? As a general rule of thumb, I’d never recommend disabling updates because security patches are essential. But the situation with Windows 10 has become intolerable. Microsoft continues to fail and continues to release update after update that they know, or should know, has serious problems.</li><li><a title="Jim&#39;s New Rig" rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/jrssnet/status/1136721049641455617">Jim's New Rig</a> &mdash; I build, sell, and manage much bigger and meaner systems than this all the time. But this one's MINE! 12 hot swap bays, Ryzen 7 2700 w/ ECC RAM, quiet enough to share an office with, and the trays can take either HDD or SSD with no adapter needed.</li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>We explore the risky world of exposed RDP, from the brute force GoldBrute botnet to the dangerously worm-able BlueKeep vulnerability.</p>

<p>Plus the importance of automatic updates, and Jim&#39;s new backup box. </p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Errata Security: Almost One Million Vulnerable to BlueKeep Vuln (CVE-2019-0708)" rel="nofollow" href="https://blog.erratasec.com/2019/05/almost-one-million-vulnerable-to.html">Errata Security: Almost One Million Vulnerable to BlueKeep Vuln (CVE-2019-0708)</a> &mdash; Microsoft announced a vulnerability in it's "Remote Desktop" product that can lead to robust, wormable exploits. I scanned the Internet to assess the danger. I find nearly 1-million devices on the public Internet that are vulnerable to the bug. </li><li><a title="Even the NSA is urging Windows users to patch BlueKeep (CVE-2019-0708) | ZDNet" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.zdnet.com/article/even-the-nsa-is-urging-windows-users-to-patch-bluekeep-cve-2019-0708/">Even the NSA is urging Windows users to patch BlueKeep (CVE-2019-0708) | ZDNet</a> &mdash; "[The] NSA is concerned that malicious cyber actors will use the vulnerability in ransomware and exploit kits containing other known exploits, increasing capabilities against other unpatched systems.

</li><li><a title="Prevent a worm by updating Remote Desktop Services (CVE-2019-0708) – MSRC" rel="nofollow" href="https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/msrc/2019/05/14/prevent-a-worm-by-updating-remote-desktop-services-cve-2019-0708/">Prevent a worm by updating Remote Desktop Services (CVE-2019-0708) – MSRC</a> &mdash; This vulnerability is pre-authentication and requires no user interaction. In other words, the vulnerability is ‘wormable’, meaning that any future malware that exploits this vulnerability could propagate from vulnerable computer to vulnerable computer in a similar way as the WannaCry malware spread across the globe in 2017</li><li><a title="BlueKeep - everyone agrees, you should patch PCs running legacy versions of Windows" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.grahamcluley.com/bluekeep-everyone-agrees-you-should-patch-pcs-running-legacy-versions-of-windows/">BlueKeep - everyone agrees, you should patch PCs running legacy versions of Windows</a> &mdash; I have this horrible feeling that the only way we’re going to wake the world up to the need to patch their ageing versions of Windows against the BlueKeep vulnerability is to wait until a malicious worm begins to spread around the world.

</li><li><a title="CVE-2019-0708 | Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability" rel="nofollow" href="https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2019-0708">CVE-2019-0708 | Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</a> &mdash; A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services – formerly known as Terminal Services – when an unauthenticated attacker connects to the target system using RDP and sends specially crafted requests. This vulnerability is pre-authentication and requires no user interaction. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on the target system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.

</li><li><a title="Customer guidance for CVE-2019-0708 | Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability" rel="nofollow" href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4500705/customer-guidance-for-cve-2019-0708">Customer guidance for CVE-2019-0708 | Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</a> &mdash; Microsoft is aware that some customers are running versions of Windows that no longer receive mainstream support. That means those customers will not have received any security updates to protect their systems from CVE-2019-0708, which is a critical remote code execution vulnerability.

</li><li><a title="Forget BlueKeep: Beware the GoldBrute | Threatpost" rel="nofollow" href="https://threatpost.com/forget-bluekeep-beware-goldbrute/145482/">Forget BlueKeep: Beware the GoldBrute | Threatpost</a> &mdash; In the past few days, GoldBrute (named after the Java class it uses) has attempted to brute-force Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) connections for 1.5 million Windows systems and counting, according to Morphus Labs chief research officer Renato Marinho. The botnet is actively scanning the internet for machines with RDP exposed, and trying out weak or reused passwords to see if it can gain access to the systems.</li><li><a title="The GoldBrute botnet" rel="nofollow" href="https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2019/06/10/the-goldbrute-botnet-is-trying-to-crack-open-1-5-million-rdp-servers/">The GoldBrute botnet</a> &mdash; The latest round of bad news emerged last week when Morphus Labs’ researcher Renato Marinho announced the discovery of an aggressive brute force campaign against 1.5 million RDP servers by a botnet called ‘GoldBrute’.

</li><li><a title="Ubuntu Automatic Updates" rel="nofollow" href="https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/serverguide/automatic-updates.html.en">Ubuntu Automatic Updates</a> &mdash; The unattended-upgrades package can be used to automatically install updated packages, and can be configured to update all packages or just install security updates. </li><li><a title="AutoUpdates - Fedora Project Wiki" rel="nofollow" href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoUpdates">AutoUpdates - Fedora Project Wiki</a> &mdash; You must decide whether to use automatic DNF or YUM updates on each of your machines. </li><li><a title="It&#39;s time to block Windows Automatic Updating | Computerworld" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3339563/its-time-to-block-windows-automatic-updating.html">It's time to block Windows Automatic Updating | Computerworld</a> &mdash; Those of you who feel it’s important to install Windows and Office patches the moment they come out – I salute you. The Windows world needs more cannon fodder.</li><li><a title="Windows 10&#39;s Ugly Updates Just Got Uglier. Here&#39;s How To Stay Safe by Disabling Automatic Updates" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinmurnane/2019/04/25/windows-10s-ugly-updates-just-got-uglier-heres-how-to-stay-safe-by-disabling-automatic-updates/#591e6ac67ff0">Windows 10's Ugly Updates Just Got Uglier. Here's How To Stay Safe by Disabling Automatic Updates</a> &mdash; Stay safe by disabling automatic updates? How is that possible? As a general rule of thumb, I’d never recommend disabling updates because security patches are essential. But the situation with Windows 10 has become intolerable. Microsoft continues to fail and continues to release update after update that they know, or should know, has serious problems.</li><li><a title="Jim&#39;s New Rig" rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/jrssnet/status/1136721049641455617">Jim's New Rig</a> &mdash; I build, sell, and manage much bigger and meaner systems than this all the time. But this one's MINE! 12 hot swap bays, Ryzen 7 2700 w/ ECC RAM, quiet enough to share an office with, and the trays can take either HDD or SSD with no adapter needed.</li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
